The Malaysian Insider
BY
V. ANBALAGAN, ASSISTANT NEWS EDITOR
November 12, 2013
November 12, 2013
The Catholic Church has taken the
fight to use the word Allah to the next level, seeking answers to 26 questions
on the Federal Constitution, administrative law as well as the power of the
court to allow the Home Minister to ban the use of a theological word.
These
questions were part of the application filed by the lawyers for the church,
seeking leave to appear before the Federal Court to challenge the Court of
Appeal's ruling on the Allah issue.
On
October 14, a three-member bench led by Datuk Seri Mohamed Apandi Ali, which
allowed Putrajaya's appeal to ban the Catholic weekly, Herald, from using the
word, said there was a 1986 directive by the Home Ministry that prohibited
non-Muslim publications from using four words – Allah, Kaabah, Solat and
Baitullah.
The
Herald has been in publication since 1994 and ministry officials had admonished
the publisher and issued showcause letters for the failure to comply with the
directive.
Apandi
in his judgment said the reason for the prohibition was to protect the sanctity
of Islam and prevent any confusion among Muslims. He also ruled that if the
word is allowed to be used by Christians, it could threaten national security
and public order.
Further
to that, the court said the prohibition was reasonable on grounds that the word
Allah was not an integral part of the Christian faith and practice.
The
decision sparked an outcry among Christians, and other non-Muslims, in the
peninsula and East Malaysia.
The
constitutional questions framed by the church's lawyers were to debate on Islam
as the religion of the federation, freedom of speech, religion and the right to
religious education.
The
questions on administrative law centred on the home minister's power. The
questions also pointed out that the minister's decision to ban the weekly
publication from using the word Allah was illegal and irrational.
The
church has also raised issues on the power of the court to allow the minister
to ban the word based on theology.
Counsel
for the church will now serve the court papers to Putrajaya and seven other
Muslim organisations who are parties to the application.
The
Federal Court registry would then proceed to fix a case management date so that
all parties are agreeable to a suitable day to hear the leave application to
appeal the ruling.
Lawyers
said the church should have no problem in obtaining leave as novel legal
questions, raised for the first time and which are of public importance, would
have been drafted.
In
2009 the Herald filed a judicial review in the High Court to challenge the home
minister's order.
Judge
Datuk Lau Bee Lan then quashed the home minister's order, ruling the ban violated
the constitutional right of the publisher.
However,
constitutional lawyers said Putrajaya's successful appeal to ban the publisher
of Herald from using the word in its newspaper also nullified the Cabinet
decision that allowed Christians nationwide to use the word in the Malay
version of the bible.
They
also said that the Court of Appeal ruling prevented all non-Muslim publications
from using the word due to the broad principal established.
After
the Court of Appeal ruling, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said
Christians in Sabah and Sarawak could continue to use the word and the
government would honour its 10-point solution.
Under
the agreement in 2011, it was agreed that bibles in all languages can be
imported into the country, including those in Bahasa Malaysia/Indonesia which
contained the word Allah.
The
10-point solution allowed for the printing, importation and distribution of the
Al-Kitab, the Bahasa Malaysia version of the bible.
Lawyer
Fahri Azzat, commenting on the court’s decision, had said since Allah “was
not an integral part of the Christian faith and practice" the word became
the monopoly of Muslims and the Islamic faith in this country.
He
said the Court of Appeal ruling affected the Herald, a publication in the
peninsula, but the effect covered the entire federation. – November 12, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment